Skip to main content

Our Rating Methodology

Transparent, comprehensive, and verified. Every rating is backed by rigorous research and testing.

Our Commitment to Quality

Verified Ratings: Every rating is verified through our multi-step quality assurance process
Regular Audits: Products are reviewed quarterly to biannually depending on rating level
Independent Analysis: Our ratings are based on direct testing, user feedback, and expert evaluation

Rating Scale

5.0
Exceptional

Best-in-class solution that exceeds expectations in all key areas

Industry-leading features
Exceptional UX
Outstanding support
Proven track record
4.0
Excellent

High-quality product that performs very well across most areas

Comprehensive features
Great UX
Reliable support
Strong value
3.0
Good

Solid product that meets basic needs adequately

Core features present
Acceptable UX
Basic support
Fair value
2.0
Fair

Product with significant limitations

Limited features
Below average UX
Minimal support
Questionable value
1.0
Poor

Not recommended for most users

Missing key features
Poor UX
Inadequate support
Poor value

Rating Factors

25%
Features & Functionality
Completeness, innovation, and reliability of features
20%
User Experience
Interface design, ease of use, and learning curve
15%
Customer Support
Availability, response time, and quality of support
15%
Value for Money
Pricing vs. features and ROI potential
15%
Reliability & Performance
Uptime, speed, and overall stability
10%
Documentation & Resources
Quality of documentation, training, and community

Our Process

1

Research Phase

3-7 days

Collect data from multiple sources including official documentation, user reviews, and industry reports

2

Testing Phase

7-30 days

Direct hands-on testing of the product, evaluating features, performance, and usability

3

Analysis Phase

2-3 days

Aggregate all data points, calculate preliminary rating, and document findings with evidence

4

Review Phase

1-2 days

Senior analyst review, fact-checking all claims, and verification of data sources

5

Approval & Publishing

1 day

Editorial team approval, compliance check, and publishing with verification badge

Quality Assurance

Regular Audits

Exceptional (4.5+): Every 3 months
Excellent (4.0-4.4): Every 3 months
Good (3.0-3.9): Every 6 months
Fair & Below: Every 12 months

Update Triggers

Major product version releases
Significant pricing changes
Security incidents or outages
Major user feedback shifts

Trust & Transparency

We believe in complete transparency. Every rating includes the last verification date, testing duration, and number of data sources used.

Affiliate Disclosure: We may earn commissions from affiliate links. However, this does not influence our ratings, which are determined solely by our evaluation criteria.

Questions? Contact us at sales@toolverdikt.com or visit our Contact page.